The Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla EspaƱol Available 24/7

San Francisco jury acquits man of sex crime for peeing in park

Sometimes prosecutors demonstrate a somewhat over-abundance of vigilance when making the decision to prosecute an alleged sex crime. Unfortunately, that sometimes means attempting to put someone behind bars for perfectly ordinary behavior. Luckily, a San Francisco Superior Court jury acted just as one might hope -- as an appropriate check on prosecutorial excess.

“It was a public park, and it was a mom with a 4-year-old,” a spokesperson for the San Francisco District Attorney's Office said, “That’s why we took it to trial. But we respect the jury’s decision.”

The DA decided to bring misdemeanor charge of indecent exposure against a homeless man because he happened to be noticed relieving himself in Franklin Square Park in August. The man was on the streets due to a recent job loss, and he didn’t mean to expose himself to anyone, his defense attorney said.

There was a soccer game going on at the time, and the 38-year-old man was preparing to void himself when shouts and cheers erupted. He turned to see who had scored -- and happened to flash his private parts at a 29-year-old woman and her small child.

The woman apparently thought the man had an erection and had intentionally flaunted it in her direction. She summoned police, who arrested him at the outraged mother’s direction. He, however, testified that thought everyone present was caught up in the soccer game, so he didn’t expect to disturb anyone. When police arrived, he was innocently watching the game.

This week, a jury acquitted the man of the indecent exposure charge -- and that’s important. Like it or not, people have been relieving themselves in places other than those designated from time immemorial  -- but this indiscretion could have put an innocent man on the sex offender registry.

He “may have made an unwise decision about where to urinate,” said his public defender in a statement, “but that innocent mistake should not brand him for life as a sex offender who preys upon women and children when it simply isn’t true.”

If we’re going to have a sex offender registry with real-world consequences, it’s in everyone’s interest for it not to include innocent people and low-level, nonviolent offenders. Yet even though the outcome of this case avoided a meaningless addition to those rolls, the trial took two days. Is that justice?

Source: SFGate, "Prepping to pee in park wasn’t perverted, jury says," Kevin Fagan, Nov. 22, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Pleasanton Office
5674 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 204
Pleasanton, CA 94588

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Pleasanton Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top