The Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla EspaƱol Available 24/7

Should Google remove smartphone app that shows police on maps?

According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, 38 states have laws in place that allow police to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Among these states is our own state of California which, thanks to the 1987 case of Ingersoll v. Palmer, has rules in place to govern how these checkpoints are to be conducted in order to avoid violating a person's rights. One such rule is publicly announcing checkpoint locations and the dates and times they will be active.

Although some continue to argue that the use of sobriety checkpoints is unconstitutional because police do not have the necessary reasonable suspicion to conduct such a stop, their use continues across the state because people have the opportunity to avoid them if they know where they will be.

Aside from listening to the news or watching for signs announcing an upcoming checkpoint stop, drivers here in California can now use their phones to tell them where officers may be posted thanks to a Google app called Waze. A combination of social networking and GPS navigation, Waze allows users to warn other drivers about possible congestion, accidents, and even the presence of police.

But aside from the legal issue of privacy, Waze appears to be angering some police departments, such as the Los Angeles Police Department, who fear that people may use the app inappropriately to target and harm police. Some departments are even asking Google to disable this feature on the app.

So should Google remove the smartphone app that shows police on maps? From the public's standpoint, the answer is no. Once an officer is seen in a certain area, they become public knowledge, some may argue. It raises an important question: how is posting this information on a cellphone app different from telling friends through word of mouth?

But from law enforcement's perspective, the answer is yes because some people might use the app to "stalk" police and harm them later on, which was the concern pointed out by Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck in a December 30th letter to Google.

Some believe though that the real concern among police departments is that the app encourages people to avoid areas with police presence, thereby reducing the likelihood of stopping a crime. It's worth pointing out though that even if this was the case, police would still need reasonable suspicion to make a traffic stop or risk violating a person's rights.

Source: The Associated Press, "Law enforcement wants popular police-tracking app disabled," Eileen Sullivan, Jan. 26, 2015

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Pleasanton Office
5674 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 204
Pleasanton, CA 94588

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Pleasanton Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top