The Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla EspaƱol Available 24/7

Lack of standard practice makes forensic science fallible

Consider for a moment the world around you, particularly when it comes to standards. When you go to the doctors or visit the hospital, there are health care and safety standards in place. The roads you drive on to get to these locations and the signs you follow are all thanks to standards. Even the vehicle you drive in needs to meet certain federal standards before a manufacturer it allowed to sell it.

Because standards and guidelines are so prominent in our everyday lives, we tend to expect that they will be existent in every aspect of our lives. But did you know that there still aren't any federal standards governing forensic science? In fact, it wasn't until January 2014 that an agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, was finally created to "improve the practice of forensic science by developing guidance concerning the intersections between forensic science and the criminal justice system."

Because of prosecutorial shows like "CSI" and "Law and Order," where forensic science is touted as the end-all-be-all of evidence, many people the nation over have a belief that forensic science is infallible. In many cases, people believe that if the results of a scientific test say a person is guilty, then there is no reason to refute this assessment. Unfortunately, as the case of Earl Washington shows, forensics isn't always perfect.

For those who do not know, Earl Washington served 17 years in prison because forensic evidence suggested that he had raped and murdered a woman. It wasn't until Washington's lawyers proved the evidence to be faulty that he was finally released.

But how could something like this happen? According to an article in Slate, the reason is because there are no federal standards that dictate how forensic tests should be performed. Furthermore, many forensic tests haven't even been properly vetted by members of the scientific community to prove their accuracy.

When a life is on the line, as was the case with Washington, accuracy should be a top priority for those within the criminal justice system. That's why we're sure many of our readers are hoping that some good comes out of the creation of the NIST and that forensic science is finally given a set of standards from which it must follow.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Pleasanton Office
5674 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 204
Pleasanton, CA 94588

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Pleasanton Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top