Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

Do sex offender registries stop sex crimes or falsely reassure?

In late 2011, a registered sex offender was found murdered in San Clemente. The perpetrator, just recently convicted of murder, told police “I like to try and protect my family.” There is no evidence the deceased ever had any contact with the perpetrator or his family.

With that in mind, a columnist for the Orange County Register recently looked into whether the registries created by Megan’s Law are effective at preventing sex crimes or an invitation to vigilante justice. His conclusion was even more troubling: sex offender registries may actually promote a dangerously false sense of security while bypassing the most likely suspects.

The Megan who inspired Megan’s Law was assaulted by a convicted sex offender who lived across the street and whom she did not know, but such as situation is actually highly unusual. The Megan’s Law website itself points out that 90 percent of child victims know their assailants, and nearly half of those assailants are family members.

The website also makes a point that calls a number of the registry’s restrictions into question -- including those prohibiting registrants from living within a half-mile of schools, parks and other places children congregate. Child sex abusers don’t hang out at parks and schools to grab kids, the website says. They are far more likely to molest children they have built relationships with.

While many people assume sex offenders are almost certainly a danger to others, that fear also seems to be exaggerated. While recidivism estimates vary, experts agree that fewer than 25 percent of convicted sex offenders ever go on to commit similar crimes.

Meanwhile, state and local governments have added an ever-growing list of restrictions on registrants. With Halloween coming up, you may be interested to know that the City of Orange now prohibits registered sex offenders from opening their doors to trick-or-treaters -- or even decorating for Halloween. The ordinance initially required them to post a large sign saying “no candy or treats at this residence.”

Are such restrictions actually accomplishing the goal of reducing sex crimes against children? If not, they might be promoting a false sense of security in the public while senselessly tormenting people who have served their debt to society and aren’t very likely to reoffend. At worst, they may turn the vigilant eyes of parents away from the seemingly trustworthy people who pose the most danger to their children.

Source: Orange County Register, "Whiting: A misplaced focus on sex offenders," David Whiting, Oct. 21, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top