The Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla EspaƱol Available 24/7

24 years after premarital sex, husband still registered offender

In 1989, a 19-year-old man was caught having sex with his 17-year-old girlfriend. It was entirely voluntary and consensual, and indeed the couple married and have been man and wife for 24 years now. Strictly speaking, however, the sex was statutory rape. He agreed to plead guilty to a count of oral copulation with a minor, thinking to minimize the consequences. It didn’t work.

Unhappily for this man, a conviction for oral copulation with a minor carries a second penalty: mandatory registration as a sex offender for life -- while a conviction for statutory rape does not. This disparity has been noticed before. In 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled that, considering that statutory rape is the more serious of the two crimes, the fact that only the lesser crime required mandatory sex offender registration violated the state constitution. If the man had filed a writ with the court, he would probably have had his name taken off the registry.

Unfortunately, it came to light in 2012 that, while he had registered initially, he hadn’t complied with the technical requirement to proactively re-register every year. He was arraigned in October for failure to re-register. It’s not clear from news reports whether he was charged with a misdemeanor or felony, but more than one failure to re-register would result in a felony charge, and he failed to comply for 10 years.

If he had just filed that writ, it would have been up to a trial court to decide whether to remove his name. It might have done so, although it could decide not to if it considered him a potential sexual predator.

That seems doubtful. Beyond being married to the putative victim, has never been arrested, charged or convicted with any other such offense.

In response to being charged with the registry violation, he has asked the court to rule that requiring him to register for life is unconstitutional. If the goal of Megan’s Law was to protect people from dangerous sexual predators, he probably shouldn’t have been put on the registry at all.

Are we any safer when people who pose absolutely no threat are included on the sex offender registry? As we discussed in October, their presence may reduce any value the registry has. Nevertheless, California prosecutors won’t hesitate to file failure to re-register charges against anyone who violates Megan’s Law.

Source: Courthouse News Service, “He's Not a Sex Offender, Married Man Says,” William Dotinga, Dec. 23, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Pleasanton Office
5674 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 204
Pleasanton, CA 94588

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Pleasanton Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-463-3661
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top