Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-463-3340 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

The questions Riley v. California left unanswered

As many of our Alameda County readers know, jurisdictional boundaries are the reason that a decision made in the court of one state may not impact a case in another state. The exception to this rule is of course the U.S. Supreme Court. Decisions made at this level oftentimes impact cases across the nation in both the criminal and civil courts. And as you may know from reading one of our articles, some cases are more impactful than others.

On June 25, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the now historical case of Riley v. California. The case was important because it asked the court for the first time to consider the requirements of when a search warrant is needed or when this necessity can be waived. The two cases within Riley v. California asked the court to think about the expectation of privacy with a cellphone and whether that was enough to require police to obtain a warrant before executing a search of the device.

Although the court's decision provided clarification when it came to cellphones and the need to obtain a warrant before searching such digital devices for evidence, the court failed to address how their ruling should affect similar cases involving personal digital devices or even if it would at all. The ruling also raised another question: does the necessity for a warrant to search a cellphone extend to previously decided cases where information had been seized from a cellphone without a warrant?

Not having an answer to this last question may leave some convicts wondering if they have the right to file an appeal or not and what their chances of winning that appeal are. Speaking with a criminal defense lawyer can help answer this question though, which may even lead to a favorable appeal as well. This is something we hope our readers will keep in mind, especially if Riley v. California could apply to their case.

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Contact Information

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Phone: 925-463-3340
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Phone: 925-463-3340
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top