Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

Critics applaud curbed wiretap program, but still voice concerns

Does a report involving a strategy used by criminal investigators that "almost certainly violated federal wiretapping laws while using millions of secretly intercepted calls and texts to make hundreds of arrests nationwide" concern you?

We thought it might.

And we submit that it should, given the fundamental and long-recognized rights of Americans to be safeguarded against unreasonable government intrusions.

Especially clandestine surveillance, particularly when it leads government agents to act against citizens absent any initial probable cause for suspecting them of criminal activity.

We offer up our blog post from November 23 of last year, inviting readers to peruse its contents (or reacquaint themselves with some key details in the event they read it when we first published it). That entry discussed a secret wiretap surveillance program in Southern California so breathtakingly extensive that federal prosecutors warned against its use.

Something so serious obviously doesn't just fade off into oblivion, especially when critics ranging from defense attorneys and civil advocates to judges and, as noted, prosecutors themselves have steadily railed against it.

In fact, the notorious wiretap initiative operating in the Los Angeles metro enclave of Riverside County has now reportedly been scaled back in material fashion, with a county legal official stating recently that the tool, while useful, "needs to be used cautiously."

That means sparingly, say critics across a wide spectrum, and only when supported by probable cause that fully supports a warrant and avoids the targeting of individuals who were not reasonably suspected initially of any ongoing criminal activity.

The number of wiretaps authorized by a judge in Riverside County last year exceeded 600. So far in 2016, only 14 wiretaps have reportedly been approved.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top