Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

DNA testing: although constantly evolving, accuracy concerns linger

Like other forms of technology, DNA testing has gone through a long and predictable odyssey of fine tuning and adjustment steered by researchers' tireless efforts to make it precisely accurate and unerring.

In other words, persons who use DNA in virtually every field -- from medical research and archaeology to cloning and police work -- want to see the science emerge as infallible and beyond reproach in any particular.

According to a recent New York Times article on DNA and its testing implications in the criminal law sphere, that lofty goal might just turn out to be ever elusive, as steady development in forensic-related technologies is proceeding in tandem with growing controversy regarding increased possibilities for error.

Years ago, the paper notes, DNA research was in an infancy stage during which chemical processes employed in testing "destroyed much of the source material."

Given that, research obviously turned to efforts that would enable accurate results with less source material involved.

In a nutshell (and simply put), researchers over the years have developed technology and techniques to increasingly reduce the amount of DNA needed for testing, which has made it easier for personnel in myriad fields -- including law enforcement -- to pronounce findings and results based on progressively smaller sample sizes of genetic material.

Is that a good thing?

The verdict seems mixed, with commentators both lauding the increased research opportunities afforded by smaller samples and the potential for error caused by contamination and flawed conclusions.

The repercussion inherent in that latter possibility can be clearly outsized -- even dramatically life changing -- for criminal suspects who are on the receiving end of faulty judgments pronounced by forensic researchers.

Technology is constantly evolving. It is also enduringly questionable, which any proven criminal defense attorney knows when it prominently features in any criminal charge brought against a client.

And it can be eminently controversial. The above-cited article notes a recent lawsuit filed by a prominent DNA researcher who was allegedly forced to retire after she called into question the accuracy of genetic testing conducted at a lab.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top