Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

Nation's highest court grapples with fundamental DUI-related issue

It would certainly be hard for most California motorists -- indeed, even including many drivers who practice law for a living -- to calmly and knowledgeably run through and consider state and federal laws applicable to drinking-related traffic stops before they respond to a police officer's requests or demands.

For starters, of course, any such police/motorist interaction is singular and stressful, and not without a dose of subjectivity exercised by a law enforcement official.

And then there is, of course, a fundamental question focused upon whether a police stop was even justified in the first place. Was there probable cause to pull over a driver? That is, did a police officer have reasonable grounds to suspect that a law was broken or that a motorist was engaging in unlawful activity?

On top of such considerations, there is also this looming concern: Where must the legal line be drawn on demands that a driver submit to invasive testing absent a warrant, with an officer alleging the need to test to preserve evidence?

The U.S. Supreme Court recently took up that question, with the result being a split majority ruling that emphasized a fundamental difference between breath and blood testing, respectively.

Although the former is constitutionally permissible in the absence of a warrant, the court held, that is not the case with a blood draw, which justices stated was more invasive and a greater privacy intrusion.

In fact, of course, broad-based complexity and ambiguity can attach to virtually any DWI/DUI police stop. A motorist with questions or concerns regarding any aspect of detention or police conduct relating to a drinking-related stop can obtain candid guidance and rigorous legal representation from a proven criminal defense attorney.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top