Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

Acceptable police conduct or tactics aimed at intimidation?

In taking purposeful action last week against a group of people they categorized as law breakers, police in the nation's capital say their sole intent was to quell violence and property destruction.

They likely weren't thinking too much about ancillary consequences, punctuated by a prominent spotlight that now hovers harshly over their chosen strategy in interacting with the general public.

In a nutshell, here's what happened last Friday, when, on Inauguration Day for incoming President Donald Trump, Washington, D.C., policemen engaged in state action involving more than 200 people situated outside in a downtown corridor: The cops encircled all the individuals within that area and then made mass arrests, slapping on those people the federal criminal charge of rioting.

Unsurprisingly, police officials say their actions were absolutely necessary.

And, equally unsurprising, a number of people at the scene -- including attorneys and national news reporters -- say they were not.

In fact, it didn't take but a few hours following the arrests for the police department to find itself as the named defendant in a federal lawsuit alleging that their conduct constitutionally violated the rights of many people who were merely exercising their lawful prerogatives of peaceful assembly and public protest.

Myriad eyewitnesses state that the mass corralling rounded up few -- if any -- individuals who had actually inflicted damage. Instead, say critics of the police action, high numbers of mere bystanders and peaceful protestors bore the brunt of what one on-the-scene attorney termed mass arrests "without individualized probable cause."

A previous corral-and-arrest effort carried out by metropolitan police back in 2002 also brought a federal lawsuit. That complaint just recently settled, resulting in more than $13 million in damages being awarded to persons who were arrested pursuant to that police action.

 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top