Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

"Growing pains:" controversy swirls around police body cameras

Zero for six.

That was the final tally on the number of police body cameras employed in a 2014 chase and fatal shooting of a teenage girl that supplied any useful evidence.

Critics of body cameras -- and, candidly, that is a progressively growing legion of naysayers across the country, including in California -- might term that a bit differently. In fact, many of them are saying that a completely ineffectual result issuing from multiple videos at the scene points squarely at evidence tampering and a collective police effort to erase footage revealing wrongful conduct.

"Obscure rather than illuminate."

Those are words used in a recent national media expose/report on what happened -- on what both police and the young girl's family say happened, respectively -- on the night the victim was fired at five times and killed by an officer during a chase in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

His camera was not on, as department policy dictated. Three other cameras worn by additional officers at the scene failed to provide footage of the shooting. A fourth camera was reportedly "oddly blurred." And two additional cameras showed nothing at all.

Understandably, that has invoked both mass ire and concern across a large swath of the general public regarding a tool that has been lauded in recent years by police agencies across the country for its alleged efficacy in increasing transparency in police/citizen encounters.

As the Washington Post notes, a growing band of camera foes now regards police use of such tools with flat suspicion, believing that departments have doctored video in many instances to create pro-police versions of realities that actually played out quite differently.

"[W]e are coming to understand that these systems can be manipulated," says a spokesperson for the victim's family.

In any criminal case where body cameras have supplied material evidence, a proven defense attorney will be sure to subject them to exacting examination, knowing that what they immediately seem to show -- or do not show -- may spell only a portion of a larger truth.

Or, indeed, a complete obscuring of what really happened.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top