Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

Privacy expectation case now at highest court review level

There will be no dearth of people paying close attention to a case focused upon cellphones and privacy in the United States Supreme Court's upcoming autumn term.

Privacy rights are, of course, a big deal in a democracy, especially in an ever-evolving society in which vast technological inroads have made it progressively easier for criminal law authorities to gain access to huge amounts of data via new platforms.

Like mass retrievals of citizens' cellphone-related data from cellphone towers, for instance.

As noted in media reports from across the country, that is precisely what is at the core of a case impending before SCOTUS that will task justices with formulating what ACLU attorneys involved in the matter call a "reasonable expectation of privacy" standard. The case spotlights cellphone data collection by government agents and offices.

Privacy advocates are keenly invested in the case. They believe it serves well as a litmus test for gauging how "a doctrine developed long before the digital age" applies in a modern world where high-tech assists make it quick and easy for government authorities to collect massive amounts of sensitive data about individuals.

In the case at bar, criminal investigators collected information relevant to a robbery suspect's movements under the federal Stored Communications Act.

Specifically, cellphone carriers provided them with phone records that covered many months and involved close to 13,000 pinpointed locations. That evidence materially contributed to the defendant's conviction on multiple robbery counts and yielded him a prison sentence of more than a century in duration.

The magnitude of that collection -- obtained without authorities having to show probable cause for the seizure -- is highly problematic and troubling to legions of critics advocating for expanded privacy protections. One attorney representing the appellants calls it "police overreach."

Although the case is seminal, it will almost certainly be followed by a steady string of other privacy-related matters into the nation's courts, including some that are ultimately reviewed on appeal by SCOTUS at the highest level. Ever-expanding technological innovations would reasonably seem to assure that.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top