Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

Supreme Court to focus on 4th Amendment search/seizure issue

The U.S. Constitution directly addresses citizens' rights in the face of governmental search-and-seizure actions.

Paramount American law is set forth in the Constitution's 4th Amendment, with that provision stating that people have a legal right "to be secure … against unreasonable searches and seizures."

That amendment further states that warrants executed by a magistrate allowing for state action to proceed must be preceded by "probable cause" and be sufficiently descriptive of the subject matter being addressed.

That language and its detailed requirements have led to legions of criminal law cases over centuries that test the precise meaning and limits of police powers regarding search-and-seizure matters. Authorities routinely contend that they stringently follow every legal requirement in 4th Amendment cases. And criminal defense attorneys often argue just as forcefully in contesting that assertion where they see violations of the law.

As with many areas of the law, exceptions apply that can render disputes even more problematic than might otherwise be the case. For example, police are customarily given some license to proceed without a warrant when they can reasonably indentify so-called "exigent" circumstances that make quick warrantless action necessary. A gunshot might suffice, for example, or a clear indication that relevant criminal evidence is being destroyed.

An impending case before the U.S. Supreme Court addresses one particular exception that authorities sometimes cite, namely, warrant requirements for vehicle searches in some instances. Police often contend that an automobile must be quickly searched for contraband or other criminal evidence, owing to some alleged inherent danger or possibility that a driver might flee and/or destroy evidence.

The case the court will hear pertains to a warrantless police search of a motorcycle parked on private property. As is true with many SCOTUS matters, the material facts are notably interesting. We spotlight the case for our readers in California and elsewhere in our next blog post.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-479-0015
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-479-0015
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top