Law Office of John W. Noonan
925-400-6635 Call For A Free Initial Consultation Se Habla Español Available 24/7

SCOTUS expansion of digital privacy rights continues

Is the nation’s highest judicial tribunal being clear enough in the signals it is sending regarding individuals’ privacy rights in the so-called digital age?

Indication are that it clearly is, and both privacy advocates and 4th Amendment purists are applauding the string of successive U.S. Supreme Court outcomes that are chipping away at unbridled enforcement power.

To wit: The court ruled relatively recently that police and other investigatory agencies cannot use GPS systems to track vehicle location without first securing a warrant to do so. The court also ruled unanimously that warrants are required by officials seeking to search cellphones.

And now, in a tight 5-4 decision announced just last week, new law applies going forward concerning phone-tracking surveillance. The SCOTUS ruling issued last Friday mandates that investigators seeking location-linked data from mobile service providers must show more than reasonable grounds to secure it. Instead, they will now need a warrant to access such information.

That spells a big change, with a lower standard having previously applied for many decades. Until last week’s ruling, courts had routinely upheld government requests to access alleged suspects’ records without a warrant and in cases where they had allegedly volunteered/relinquished personal information to third parties (e.g., banks, libraries, phone companies and so forth).

The instant decision clearly reflects the court’s focus on previously unforeseen technology that is now fundamentally changing the way we live.

“Few could have imagined a society in which a phone goes wherever its owner goes,” Chief Justice John Roberts stated in his written opinion. Roberts stressed that, “This newfound tracking capacity runs against everyone.”

Case advocates hope that the ruling, while being expressly limited to cellphones and cell-site tracking, will have broader implications in the future. They stress that it could provide bedrock protection in cases involving government requests to access other digital information as well. That includes things such as emails, home-based “smart” appliances and additional data sources that have not even been developed yet.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Recent Case Results

  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    John was able to get client a reduction of charge of a DUI because of being a nurse it could mean her license.

    He secured a Drunk in Public , and she would attend a 3 month program. Additionally, the dmv hearing was also set aside.

    Both being a win for the client.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    A client was arrested for a Felony Domestic Violence, could have devastated her potential for future employment. John was able to get the case dismissed. Client was thrilled.

    Read More
  • Juvenile Charges

    A juvenile was arrested for 2nd Degree Robbery. After 6 months the case was dismissed.

    A juvenile was arrested for Sexual Battery. After 6 months and 80 hours of Community service, the case was dismissed.

    Read More
  • Drunk Driving Offenses

    A client with a 1st DUI arrest. Fearing she would go to jail; lose her license for a year and lose her job. Got a wet reckless and minimal fines.

    Read More
  • Drug Charges

    A client with 4 Felony charges on a Transportation Charge, a Attempt to Sell, Possession of Marijuana, (50 pounds), Conspiracy Charge all where reduced to 1 Misdemeanor. No Jail.

    Client was charged with 6 Felony drug possessions. Facing jail time. The results: Client got a deferred entry of judgment and then dismissed.

    Client charged with several felony counts of possession of Marijuana with intent to sell. Client was involved in a medical marijuana grow. Case was reduced and later dismissed.

    Read More
  • Sex Crimes

    A client with alleged 2 Felony Sex charges and he faced jail and sex registration. The case was entirely dismissed.

    Client charged with prostitution; facing jail time and sex offender registration. Result: NO JAIL TIME AND NO SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Deferred Entry of Judgment.

    Read More
  • Domestic Violence

    Client charged with domestic violence, with great bodily injury. Case reduced to a misdemeanor with time served.

    Read More
Email Us For A Response

Learn How We Can Help

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Areas We Serve

Dublin Office
6379 Clark Avenue
Suite 250
Dublin, CA 94568

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Toll Free: 800-743-3896
Phone: 925-400-6635
Fax: 925-463-3661
Dublin Law Office Map

Manteca Office
210 East Center Street
Suite 10
Manteca, CA 95336

Toll Free: 800-785-9556
Toll Free: 800-743-3896
Phone: 209-498-3521
Fax: 925-463-3661
Manteca Law Office Map

Back To Top