Criminal law charging and sentencing particulars in the federal realm merit pronounced emphasis in any defense firm’s blog posts, and we unquestionably give them due regard at the Bay Area Law Office of John W. Noonan.
Many California individuals involved with the criminal justice system find out quickly that outcomes can differ starkly based on whether they are facing a state or federal offense.
It’s not hard to see where considerable time and effort is being expended in federal criminal investigations these days. Simply following what seems to be a clear money trail leads straight to the source.
The Law Office of John W. Noonan has advocated diligently for decades on behalf of defendants from California and nationally facing federal criminal charges.
Saying that the federal government "has borne substantial costs as a result of the opioid crisis," high-ranking regulators have signaled a new focus in their response to the problem.
How can you come to a conclusion regarding any social experiment without first seeking to understand it through objective analysis?
We note on our criminal defense website at The Law Office of John W. Noonan in Dublin the many enforcement probes these days of government investigators focused on alleged white collar criminal activity.
We submit in today's blog post that even some people who disagree with the recent ruling of a U.S. federal appellate court regarding warrants and the suppression of evidence can understand the court's reasoning and its rationale for ruling against the government.
As duly noted in an online overview of tax-focused subject matter, the Internal Revenue Service understands that the federal tax code and attendant rules "are difficult for most people to decipher."
Persons who take more than a passing interest in criminal law matters -- as we know our readers in Alameda County and across California do -- are certainly aware that law enforcers now deem white collar crime to be a focal point of highest concern.